Search Results
Showing 1 - 19 of 19 results.
- Search terms can be anywhere in the study: title, description, variables, etc.
- Because our holdings are large, we recommend using at least two query terms:
rural economy
home ownership
higher education
- Keywords help delimit the breadth of results. Therefore, use as many as required to achieve your desired results:
elementary education federal funding
- Our search will find studies with derivative expressions of your query terms: A search for
"nation"
will find results containing "national" - Use quotes to search for an exact expression:
"social mobility"
- You can combine exact expressions with loose terms:
"united states" inmates
- Exclude results by using a MINUS sign:
elections -sweden -germany
will exclude swedish and german election studies - On the results page, you will be able to sort and filter to further refine results.
Hidden
Study Title/Investigator
Released/Updated
1.
Effective School Staff Interactions with Students and Police: A Training Model (ESSI), Connecticut, 2013-2018 (ICPSR 37486)
Sabatelli, Ronald
Sabatelli, Ronald
This project assesses the effectiveness of a one-day, 5-hour workshop (ESSI training, hereafter) designed for joint instruction by school staff and police to all school staff. The goal was to promote positive outcomes and reduce police involvement in interactions between staff and students exhibiting inappropriate behavior through increased staff awareness of youth behavior, the functions of the juvenile justice system, and disproportionate minority contact (DMC) in disciplinary action.
1,024 school staff participated in 51 ESSI training sessions throughought the 2015/16 academic year, which also serves as the training year in the longitudinal data. Schools which did not participate in the training served as controls for the participating school. Data were drawn from a panel of students enrolled in either a training or control school, with ten schools in each group. Data on this panel of students was collected for a five-year period, from the 2013/14 through the 2017/18 academic years.
School-level data serves as the unit of analysis, as the study's main goal was to test the effects of training on school-wide outcomes. The estimated coefficient indicates small attendance reductions during the post-training phase for the training group. This indicates that most of the differences between the training and control group were statistically insignificant and that there was no pattern of statistically significant positive effects across the training schools. The second set of analyses, performed on student-level data, indicates that male and minority students are more likely to be involved in disciplinary incidents and to receive suspensions or expulsions as a consequence of their behaviors than White and female students.
2021-04-28
2.
Fast Response Survey System (FRSS): Arts Education Surveys of Elementary School Teachers, 2009-2010 (ICPSR 36069)
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
The Fast Response Survey System (FRSS) was established in 1975 by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), United States Department of Education. FRSS is designed to collect issue-oriented data within a relatively short time frame. FRSS collects data from state education agencies, local education agencies, public and private elementary and secondary schools, public school teachers, and public libraries. To ensure minimal burden on respondents, the surveys are generally limited to three pages of questions, with a response burden of about 30 minutes per respondent. Sample sizes are relatively small (usually about 1,000 to 1,500 respondents per survey) so that data collection can be completed quickly. Data are weighted to produce national estimates of the sampled education sector. The sample size is large enough to permit limited breakouts by classification variables. However, as the number of categories within the classification variables increases, the sample size within categories decreases, which results in larger sampling errors for the breakouts by classification variables.
The Arts Education Surveys of Elementary School Teachers provide national estimates on arts education and arts instructors in public elementary schools during the 2009-10 school year. This data collection contains three surveys that provide information about music specialists, visual arts specialists, and self-contained classroom teachers. These three surveys are part of a set of seven surveys that collected data on arts education during the 2009-10 school year. In addition to these elementary teacher surveys, the set includes a survey of elementary school principals, a survey of secondary school principals, and two secondary teacher-level surveys. A stratified sample design was used to select teachers and arts specialists (music and visual arts) for the Arts Education Surveys of Elementary School Teachers. Data collection was conducted September 2009 through August 2010. Altogether, 1,148 eligible music specialists, 918 eligible visual arts specialists, and 734 eligible self-contained classroom teachers completed the surveys by web, mail, fax, or telephone.
The elementary teacher surveys collected data on the availability of curriculum-based arts education activities outside of regular school hours, teaching load of music and visual arts specialists in elementary schools, teacher participation in various professional development activities, the ways in which self-contained classroom teachers teach arts education as part of their instructional program, and teachers' use of formal methods of assessment of students' achievement in the arts. Furthermore, teachers were also asked to provide administrative information such as school level, school enrollment size, school community type, and percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.
2016-05-02
3.
Fast Response Survey System (FRSS): Arts Education Surveys of Secondary School Teachers, 2009-2010 (ICPSR 36070)
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
The Fast Response Survey System (FRSS) was established in 1975 by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), United States Department of Education. FRSS is designed to collect issue-oriented data within a relatively short time frame. FRSS collects data from state education agencies, local education agencies, public and private elementary and secondary schools, public school teachers, and public libraries. To ensure minimal burden on respondents, the surveys are generally limited to three pages of questions, with a response burden of about 30 minutes per respondent. Sample sizes are relatively small (usually about 1,000 to 1,500 respondents per survey) so that data collection can be completed quickly. Data are weighted to produce national estimates of the sampled education sector. The sample size is large enough to permit limited breakouts by classification variables. However, as the number of categories within the classification variables increases, the sample size within categories decreases, which results in larger sampling errors for the breakouts by classification variables.
The Arts Education Surveys of Secondary School Teachers provide national estimates on arts education and arts instructors in public secondary schools during the 2009-10 school year. This data collection contains two surveys that provide information about music specialists and visual arts specialists. These two surveys are part of a set of seven surveys that collected data on arts education during the 2009-10 school year. In addition to these secondary teacher surveys, the set includes a survey of elementary school principals, a survey of secondary school principals, and three elementary teacher-level surveys. A stratified sample design was used to select music specialists and visual arts specialists for the Arts Education Surveys of Secondary School Teachers. Data collection was conducted September 2009 through July 2010. Altogether, 1,065 eligible music specialists and 1,046 eligible visual arts specialists completed the surveys by web, mail, fax, or telephone.
The secondary teacher surveys collected data on the availability of curriculum-based arts education activities outside of regular school hours; teaching load of music and visual arts specialists in secondary schools; teacher participation in various professional development activities and the perceived impact of such participation on teaching; and teachers' use of formal methods of assessment of students' progress and achievement in the arts. Furthermore, teachers were also asked to provide administrative information such as school level, school enrollment size, school community type, and percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.
2016-05-02
4.
Fast Response Survey System (FRSS): Elementary School Arts Education Survey, Fall 2009 (ICPSR 36067)
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
The Fast Response Survey System (FRSS) was established in 1975 by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), United States Department of Education. FRSS is designed to collect issue-oriented data within a relatively short time frame. FRSS collects data from state education agencies, local education agencies, public and private elementary and secondary schools, public school teachers, and public libraries. To ensure minimal burden on respondents, the surveys are generally limited to three pages of questions, with a response burden of about 30 minutes per respondent. Sample sizes are relatively small (usually about 1,000 to 1,500 respondents per survey) so that data collection can be completed quickly. Data are weighted to produce national estimates of the sampled education sector. The sample size is large enough to permit limited breakouts by classification variables. However, as the number of categories within the classification variables increases, the sample size within categories decreases, which results in larger sampling errors for the breakouts by classification variables.
The Elementary School Arts Education Survey, Fall 2009 data provide national estimates on student access to arts education and resources available for such instruction in public elementary schools during fall 2009. This is one of a set of seven surveys that collected data on arts education during the 2009-10 school year. In addition to this survey, the set includes a survey of secondary school principals, three elementary teacher-level surveys, and two secondary teacher-level surveys. A stratified sample design was used to select principals for this survey. Data collection was conducted September 2009 through June 2010, and 988 eligible principals completed the survey by web, mail, fax, or telephone.
The elementary school survey collected data on the availability and characteristics of music, visual arts, dance, and drama/theatre instruction; the type of space used for arts instruction; the availability of curriculum guides for arts teachers to follow; the availability of curriculum-based arts education activities outside of regular school hours; and whether those teaching the subject are arts specialists. Principals also reported on school or district provision of teacher professional development in the arts; arts education programs, activities, and events; and school-community partnerships. Principals were also asked to provide administrative information such as school instructional level, school enrollment size, community type, and percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.
2016-05-02
5.
Fast Response Survey System (FRSS): Secondary School Arts Education Survey, Fall 2009 (ICPSR 36068)
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
United States Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics
The Fast Response Survey System (FRSS) was established in 1975 by the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), United States Department of Education. FRSS is designed to collect issue-oriented data within a relatively short time frame. FRSS collects data from state education agencies, local education agencies, public and private elementary and secondary schools, public school teachers, and public libraries. To ensure minimal burden on respondents, the surveys are generally limited to three pages of questions, with a response burden of about 30 minutes per respondent. Sample sizes are relatively small (usually about 1,000 to 1,500 respondents per survey) so that data collection can be completed quickly. Data are weighted to produce national estimates of the sampled education sector. The sample size is large enough to permit limited breakouts by classification variables. However, as the number of categories within the classification variables increases, the sample size within categories decreases, which results in larger sampling errors for the breakouts by classification variables.
The Secondary School Arts Education Survey, Fall 2009 data provide national estimates on student access to arts education and the resources available for such instruction in public secondary schools during fall 2009. This is one of a set of seven surveys that collected data on arts education during the 2009-10 school year. In addition to this survey, the set includes a survey of elementary school principals, three elementary teacher-level surveys, and two secondary teacher-level surveys. A stratified sample design was used to select principals for this survey. Data collection was conducted September 2009 through June 2010, and 1,014 eligible principals completed the survey by web, mail, fax, or telephone.
The secondary school survey collected data on the availability of music, visual arts, dance, and drama/theatre instruction; enrollment in these courses, the type of space used for arts instruction, the availability of curriculum guides for arts teachers to follow, and the number of arts teachers who are specialists in the subject. Principals reported on graduation requirements for coursework in the arts; school or district provision of teacher professional development in the arts; and arts education programs, activities, and events. Principals also reported on community partnerships and support from outside sources for arts education. Furthermore, principals were also asked to provide administrative information such as school instructional level, school enrollment size, community type, and percent of students eligible for free or reduced-price lunch.
2016-05-02
6.
Improvement of Elementary Fractions Instruction: Randomized Controlled Trial Using Lesson Study with a Fractions Resource Kit, United States, 2016-2018 (ICPSR 38205)
Lewis, Catherine; Schoen, Robert C.
Lewis, Catherine; Schoen, Robert C.
This study involved random assignment of 80 school-based teams of educators to one of four conditions: (1) lesson study supported by a fractions resource kit; (2) lesson study without the fractions resource kit; (3) fractions resource kit without lesson study; or (4) practice-as-usual (no fractions resource kit, asked to refrain from lesson study). Teams were mailed the materials for their condition and used them locally. Each educator team included at least one grade 3 or 4 teacher who agreed to video record three fractions lessons, and their students comprise the student sample. Outcome measures focus on instruction, student fractions knowledge, teachers' fractions knowledge, beliefs about teaching-learning, and professional learning perceptions.
2022-10-06
7.
Kentucky Professional Development Framework Impact on Quality and Child Outcomes, 2006-2007 (ICPSR 26341)
Rous, Beth; Grisham Brown, Jennifer
Rous, Beth; Grisham Brown, Jennifer
In 2000, the Kentucky General Assembly passed historic early childhood legislation (Kentucky's KIDS [Kentucky Invests in Developing
Success] NOW Initiative) of which a component included the development of a seamless professional development system. The professional development system includes core content, articulation, credentials, scholarships and a training framework. This comprehensive professional development system, along with other initiative components in assuring maternal and child health, supporting families, enhancing early care and education, and establishing a support structure, have moved the field of early childhood care and education forward in the state and improved child and family outcomes.
This study was designed to build on the KIDS NOW Initiative by conducting research investigating the degree to which a statewide unified professional development system impacted the educational level of early care and education providers and subsequent classroom quality. It focused on three major predictors of professional development outcomes:
Individual teacher characteristics, including learning readiness, education (level and type), training experience, attitudes towards training, personality (conscientiousness, self-efficacy), job satisfaction (perceptions of support)
Characteristics of the program administrator, including administrator education and administrator support of professional development
Characteristics of the teacher's work setting, including program administration, and policies and procedures, and classroom setting (Child Care, Head Start, or Public Preschool)
The impact of these three predictors was measured on two major outcomes: (a) professional development outcomes, as measured by job status, learning and transfer of learning, and (b) organizational outcomes, as measured by program quality, child outcomes and staff retention.
The research questions guiding this research were focused on determining the degree to which (1) a unified professional development framework initiated at the state level results in positive child outcomes, and (2) the educational level of early care and education providers enhances the quality of classroom environments. Specifically:
What components of a professional development framework are more effective in encouraging and supporting individuals to remain in early care and education settings?
What components of a professional development framework are more effective in supporting early care and education professionals in enhancing classroom quality and child outcomes?
Are there specific factors that impact early care and education professionals' ability to participate in professional development activities at various levels?
Does the level and intensity of professional development experiences impact classroom quality and child outcomes?
What personnel factors have the highest impact on quality classroom environments and child outcomes?
What is the interaction between the personnel, professional development, and program variables on classroom quality and child outcomes?
2010-12-16
8.
Kidsteps II-Efficacy Trial of Second Step Early Learning (SSEL) Program: Promoting School Readiness through Social Emotional Skill Building in Preschool, Worcester County, Massachusetts, 2013-2017 (ICPSR 37521)
University of Massachusetts Medical School. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health; Upshur, Carole C.; University of Massachusetts Medical School; Wenz-Gross, Melodie
University of Massachusetts Medical School. Department of Family Medicine and Community Health; Upshur, Carole C.; University of Massachusetts Medical School; Wenz-Gross, Melodie
The Kidsteps II Project tested the efficacy of the Second Step Early Learning (SSEL) curriculum in improving children's social-emotional skills (SE), executive functioning (EF), and school readiness skills in preschool relative to usual curricular frameworks, and the predictive power of the intervention on kindergarten readiness and kindergarten success. Kidsteps
II, a 4-year study funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Institute of
Education Sciences, included 67 classrooms randomly assigned to one of two, two-year cohorts. In each cohort, half of the classrooms were randomly assigned to receive the SSEL curriculum (intervention condition), and half continued usual practices (control/comparison condition). Teachers in intervention classrooms were provided with training and implementation support for two years. Teachers in both conditions completed social skills rating scales on participating children at the beginning and end of the year (n=1497). Parent reports of children's social skills were also obtained for 725 children. Four-year-old children entering kindergarten the following year (n=978) were individually tested on social skills, executive functioning, and academic skills at the beginning and end of their pre-k year. Additional classroom observation and coded lesson plans documented fidelity, implementation, classroom climate, and classroom quality. Intervention teachers also completed weekly measures of curriculum implementation. Pre-k children from the first three years of the study were followed into kindergarten, and kindergarten teachers completed social skills rating scales and academic readiness mid-year, and school records were obtained for kindergarten screening scores, special services received during kindergarten, and promotion to first grade. The study addressed the following questions:
Does SSEL improve children's social emotional skills, executive functioning, and school readiness skills as measured by teachers and independent assessors in preschool compared to classrooms not using SSEL?
Do children participating in SSEL classrooms have stronger school system administered kindergarten readiness screenings, better kindergarten teacher-rated social skills and academic competency, and higher 1st grade promotion compared to children entering from comparison classrooms?
To what extent are kindergarten readiness screenings and kindergarten teacher's ratings of social skills and academic competence mediated by preschool children's social emotional skills and executive functioning?
Is there an effect of SSEL on preschool classroom climate?
2020-04-27
9.
MT21 is a cross-national study of the preparation of middle school mathematics teachers. Countries participating included Chinese Taipei (Taiwan), South Korea (Korea), Bulgaria, Germany, Mexico, and the United States. Data were collected from teachers in their first and last year of preparation by sampling institutions in each country. Future teachers were asked about their backgrounds, course-taking and program activities, knowledge relevant to their teaching (mathematical and pedagogical), and beliefs and perspectives on content and pedagogy.
The 1995 Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) data revealed that countries with higher achievement have teachers who teach substantially different content than that of their less accomplished counterparts (see Schmidt et al., 1996; Schmidt et al., 2001). The 1996 Report of the National Commission on Teaching and America's Future argued that what teachers know and do in the classroom matters for pupil learning. It also argued that teacher education might be a viable policy tool to improve the quality of education (National Commission on Teaching and America's Future, 1996). United States reform efforts are consistent with this line of thought. They have introduced standards to measure teacher quality as it relates to student achievement. This, in turn, led to accountability concerns regarding teacher preparation programs (INTASC, 1995; Murray, 2000; Leithwood, Edge and Jantzi, 1999; NCATE, 2000).
The MT21 Project was designed to answer the following question: how shall we prepare our future teachers to teach a more rigorous curriculum to all students? Several assumptions were made going into this work: the concepts and models defining teacher preparation are not fixed across the world. Recognizing and understanding this diversity to develop a cross-national study of teacher preparation poses a complex and challenging problem. It is hoped that the resulting international data would not only serve to provide policy insights but would also bring about change by making visible contrasts with other countries in terms of teacher preparation in the United States.
2013-03-04
10.
National Center for Early Development and Learning Multistate Study of Pre-Kindergarten, 2001-2003 (ICPSR 4283)
Clifford, Richard M.; Bryant, Donna; Burchinal, Margaret; Barbarin, Oscar; Early, Diane; Howes, Carollee; Pianta, Robert; Winton, Pam
Clifford, Richard M.; Bryant, Donna; Burchinal, Margaret; Barbarin, Oscar; Early, Diane; Howes, Carollee; Pianta, Robert; Winton, Pam
The National Center for Early Development and Learning
(NCEDL) Multi-State Study of Pre-Kindergarten examined the
pre-kindergarten programs of six states: California, Illinois, New
York, Ohio, Kentucky, and Georgia. For this study, pre-kindergarten
(pre-k) included center-based programs for four-year-olds that are
fully or partially funded by state education agencies and that are
operated in schools or under the direction of state and local
education agencies.
The study had two primary purposes:
To describe the variations of experiences for children in
pre-kindergarten and kindergarten programs in school-related settings
(public schools and state-funded pre-k classrooms in community-based
settings), and
To examine the relationships between variations in
pre-kindergarten/kindergarten experiences and children's outcomes in
early elementary school.
The study addressed six primary groups of research questions:
What is the nature and distribution of education and
experience of teachers and teacher assistants in pre-k public school
programs?
What is the nature and distribution of global quality and
specific practices in key areas such as literacy, math, and
teacher-child relationships in a diverse sample of pre-k public school
programs for four-year-olds as well as in a similarly diverse sample
of kindergarten classes?
How do quality and practices vary as a result of child and
teacher characteristics (e.g., child gender, race, home language,
family income, and teacher's years of education) and classroom,
program, community, and state structural variables (e.g.,
teacher-child ratio, funding base of the program, teacher salary, and
degree of state regulation) for children with different demographic
characteristics (e.g., race, gender, home language, and family
income)?
Do quality and practice vary in relation to combinations
of these variables? For example, are quality and practice a function
of family poverty and teacher pay or education?
Can children's outcomes at the end of their
pre-kindergarten year be predicted by the children's experiences in
pre-k programs? Are the various dimensions of quality and/or practice
differentially related to outcomes? Are these relationships constant
across a population of children with different characteristics (e.g.,
race, gender, home language, and family income)?
Do pre-kindergarten program quality and practices predict
children's transitions to kindergarten and children's skills at the
end of the kindergarten year? Are these transitions moderated by
children's characteristics, like race, gender, and family
income?
The six states in the study were selected based on the significant
amount of resources they have committed to pre-k initiatives. States
were also selected to maximize the diversity in geography, program
settings (public school or community), program intensity (full day
versus part day), and educational requirements for teachers. Within
each state, a random sample of 40 centers/schools was selected. One
classroom in each center/school was selected at random for
observation, and four children in each classroom were selected for
individual assessment. The children were followed from the beginning
of pre-k through the end of kindergarten. In five of the six states,
families we,re also visited in their homes.
Classroom Services and Specific Instructional Practices
Within the 40 classrooms in each participating state, carefully
trained data collectors conducted classroom observations twice each
year, while additional surveys were used to gather information from
administrators/principals, teachers, and parents. Data were gathered
on program services, (e.g., healthcare, meals, and transportation),
program curriculum, teacher training and education, teachers' opinions
of child development, and their instructional practices on subjects
such as language, literacy, mathematics concepts, and
social-emotional competencies. Data were also collected as to what
types of steps were taken to aid children in their transitions from
pre-k to kindergarten.
Children
Within each participating pre-k classroom, four randomly selected
children were assessed using a battery of individual instruments to
measure language, literacy, mathematics, and related concept
development, as well as social competence. A panel of expert reviewers
aided the researchers in selecting a variety of standardized and
nonstandardized assessments. The pre-k child assessments were
conducted in the fall and spring of 2001-2002. The same children were
followed into kindergarten and assessed in the fall and spring of
2002-2003 to examine whether specific practices employed by pre-k
teachers made a difference in their transitions to kindergarten.
Families
In individual home-based interviews, information on socio-economic,
socio-cultural, and familial contexts were obtained through open-ended
questions, structured ratings, and videotaped parent-child interactions.
Specifically, parents were asked about (1) family life as it relates
to socio-economic status and socio-cultural environment, (2) family
educational practices and beliefs about the comparative roles of
school and family in educating children, (3) the nature and quality of
the home-school relationship, and (4) their own ratings of their
children's psychological development and social competence.
Demographic information collected includes race, gender, family
income, and mother's education level.
The above information pertains to the Main Child Level Public-Use Version and the Main Child Level Restricted-Use Version. From these main datasets, subsets were created at the classroom level for Pre-Kindergarten (Pre-K Classroom Level Public-Use Version and Pre-K Classroom Level Restricted-Use Version) and for Kindergarten (Kindergarten Classroom Level Public-Use Version and Kindergarten Classroom Level Restricted-Use Version).
2017-07-17
11.
National Center for Teacher Effectiveness Main Study (ICPSR 36095)
Kane, Thomas; Hill, Heather; Staiger, Douglas
Kane, Thomas; Hill, Heather; Staiger, Douglas
The National Center for Teacher Effectiveness Main Study (NCTE) encompasses three years of data collection and observations of math instruction in approximately 50 schools and 300 classrooms. Data were collected from classroom observations, student assessments, and teacher surveys. Teacher background information includes number of years of experience, education, race, and gender. Student respondent demographic and household information includes race, gender, household makeup, free and reduced lunch status, English proficiency, number of books in the household, and number of rooms in the home.
2022-06-16
12.
Office of Head Start Program Information Report (PIR) (ICPSR 36847)
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Head Start
United States Department of Health and Human Services. Administration for Children and Families. Office of Head Start
The Office of Head Start Program Information Report (PIR) provides comprehensive data on the services, staff, children, and families served by Head Start and Early Head Start programs nationwide. All grantees and delegates are required to submit PIR for Head Start and Early Head Start Programs. PIR data is compiled for use at the federal, regional, state, and local level.
The PIR collects data on child, staff, and family demographics and program characteristics including data on physical health, mental health, disabilities, and family services. All of this data is aggregated and reported by each program to the Office of Head Start.
2017-07-28
13.
The Partnership Impact Research Project is a three-year
study designed to assess the nature of early education partnerships
among Head Start, pre-kindergarten (pre-k), child care, and early care
and education programs and their influence on child care quality and
access to services. The project analyzes qualitative data in an
existing database that was collected by the
Quality in Linking Together
(QUILT) Early Education Partnerships initiative. The QUILT
database was designed to provide training and technical assistance in
the development and sustainment of partnerships to professionals
across the nation, including early care and education providers and
state leaders. It is divided into two sections: state-level and local
provider-level information. Both sections contain narratives, factual
data, and documents. Additionally, the project collected new
quantitative and qualitative data from randomly selected child care
and Head Start providers in Ohio to study the influence of
partnerships on the quality of and access to services.
The Partnership Impact Research Project explored questions about
partnerships and their impact on child care and parents while
attempting to determine whether state actions could influence both the
development of provider-level partnerships and the processes
partnerships engage in to sustain their work. Specifically, the study
was designed to address the following objectives:
Conduct a qualitative analysis of data in an existing database
to assess the nature of partnerships and state actions to support
partnerships.
Conduct a longitudinal study that uses a quasi-experimental
design and involves original data collection at three points in time
to learn about the impact of partnerships on child care center
quality, child care classroom quality, and accessibility of services
for parents.
Develop detailed reports and research briefs, tailored to
specific audiences such as legislators, administrators, and providers,
that translate research findings into practical information that
addresses questions frequently asked about child care partnerships.
Disseminate research reports and briefs through established
networks of policy makers and practitioners, using their
organizations' Web sites and publications.
The six datasets associated with this data collection are
summarized below:
Child Care Center Data -- contains information on a variety of
aspects about a child care center from the director's point of view
with many focused questions aimed at the preschool population and an
overview of the child care center as a whole. This dataset provides
information about the population being served, services provided,
teacher ratios, teacher training and education, annual budgets,
funding sources, and other major aspects of a child care center in
order to achieve an understanding of quality.
Child Care Center Partnership Data -- contains information about
the child care partnership with the Head Start Agency that provides
their services. There are five sections: funding sources, origins of
the partnership, resources, nature of the partnership, and
benefits/challenges. Information about how the partnership began, what
the centers' role is, what services are provided, and a variety of
general questions that inform others about the nature of the
partnership are available in this dataset.
Head Start Background Data -- contains background information
about a Head Start Agency that partners with child care centers and
other information related to budget, funding sources, number of
children served, and Head Start program organization.
Head Start Partnership Data -- a companion to the Head Start
Background data, this dataset ,contains information about the specific
partnership with each child care center the agency is involved
with. There are four sections: background information, teacher
training/professional development, services, and director
information. Additionally, information on how the partnership began,
what the agency's role is, what services are provided, and other
general questions about the partnership is available.
Parent Data -- contains information on parents' views of the
child care center that their preschooler attends. This dataset
provides information about the population being served including
home/school connection, how a parent views the classroom and the care
being provided by the center, and the services available to both the
child and parent through the center.
Teacher Data -- contains information about teachers' views of the
child care center where they are employed. This dataset provides
information about the population being served, services provided,
teacher ratios, teacher training and education, and teacher experience
in order to achieve an understanding of quality.
2006-04-17
14.
Pre-Kindergarten in Eleven States: NCEDL's Multi-State Study of Pre-Kindergarten and Study of State-Wide Early Education Programs (SWEEP) (ICPSR 34877)
Early, Diane; Burchinal, Margaret; Barbarin, Oscar; Bryant, Donna; Chang, Florence; Clifford, Richard M.; Crawford, Gisele; Weaver, Wanda; Howes, Carollee; Ritchie, Sharon; Kraft-Sayre, Marcia; Pianta, Robert; Barnett, W. Steven
Early, Diane; Burchinal, Margaret; Barbarin, Oscar; Bryant, Donna; Chang, Florence; Clifford, Richard M.; Crawford, Gisele; Weaver, Wanda; Howes, Carollee; Ritchie, Sharon; Kraft-Sayre, Marcia; Pianta, Robert; Barnett, W. Steven
The National Center for Early Development and Learning (NCEDL) combined the data of two major studies in order to understand variations among state-funded pre-kindergarten (pre-k) programs and in turn, how these variations relate to child outcomes at the end of pre-k and in kindergarten. The Multi-State Study of Pre-Kindergarten and the State-Wide Early Education Programs (SWEEP) Study provide detailed information on pre-kindergarten
teachers, children, and classrooms in 11 states. By combining data from both studies, information is available from 721 classrooms and 2,982 pre-kindergarten children in these 11 states.
Pre-kindergarten data collection for the Multi-State Study of Pre-Kindergarten took place during the 2001-2002 school year in six states: California, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, New York, and Ohio. These states were selected from among states that had committed significant resources to pre-k initiatives. States were selected to maximize diversity with regard to geography, program settings (public school or community setting), program intensity (full-day vs. part-day), and educational requirements for teachers. In each state, a stratified random sample of 40 centers/schools was selected from the list of all the school/centers or programs (both contractors and subcontractors) provided to the researchers by each state's department of education.
In total, 238 sites participated in the fall and two additional sites joined the study in the spring. Participating teachers helped the data collectors recruit children into the study by sending recruitment packets home with all children enrolled in the classroom. On the first day of data collection, the data collectors determined which of the children were eligible to participate. Eligible children were those who (1) would be old enough for kindergarten in the fall of 2002, (2) did not have an Individualized Education Plan, according to the teacher, and (3) spoke English or Spanish well enough to understand simple instructions, according to the teacher.
Pre-kindergarten data collection for the SWEEP Study took place during the
2003-2004 school year in five states: Massachusetts, New Jersey, Texas,
Washington, and Wisconsin. These states were selected to complement the
states already in the Multi-State Study of Pre-K by including programs with
significantly different funding models or modes of service delivery. In each of the five states, 100 randomly selected state-funded pre-kindergarten sites were recruited for participation in the study from a list of all sites provided by the state.
In total, 465 sites participated in the fall. Two sites declined to continue participation in the spring, resulting in 463 sites participating in the spring. Participating teachers helped the data collectors recruit children into the study
by sending recruitment packets home with all children enrolled in the
classroom. On the first day of data collection, the data collectors determined
which of the children were eligible to participate. Eligible children were those
who (1) would be old enough for kindergarten in the fall of 2004, (2) did not have
an Individualized Education Plan, according to the teacher, and (3) spoke
English or Spanish well enough to understand simple instructions, according to the teacher.
Demographic information collected across both studies includes race, teacher gender, child gender, family income, mother's education level, and teacher educat,ion level.
The researchers also created a variable for both the child-level data and the class-level data which allows secondary users to subset cases according to either the Multi-State or SWEEP study.
2013-10-02
15.
The Evaluation of Child Care Subsidy Strategies is a multi-site, multi-year effort to determine whether and how different child care subsidy policies and procedures and quality improvement efforts help low-income parents obtain and hold onto jobs and improve outcomes for children. Funding from the Child Care and Development Fund (CCDF) administered by the Child Care Bureau are divided into two purposes. The vast majority are aimed at assisting children of low-income working parents whose eligibility is determined by states within broad federal guidelines, while a much smaller portion (4 percent) work with state matching funds to improve the quality of child care for all children. For this studies series, four experiments were conducted, two test alternative subsidy policies for low-income families and two test approaches to the use of set-aside funds for improving child care quality for all children. The four study sites and focus of evaluation include: (1) effectiveness of three language and literacy curricula on teaching practices and children's language and literacy outcomes (Miami-Dade County, Florida); (2) impact of alternative eligibility and re-determination child care subsidy policies on parental employment outcomes (Illinois); (3) impact of alternative child care co-payment structures on use of child care subsidies and employment outcomes (Washington) and (4) effectiveness of training on Learning Games curriculum in changing care-giving practices in family child care homes and children's developmental outcomes (Massachusetts).
A two-year experiment, Project Upgrade tests the effectiveness of three different language and literacy interventions, Ready, Set, Leap! (RSL!), Breakthrough to Literacy (BTL) and Building Early Language and Literacy (BELL) implemented in child care centers in Miami-Dade County, Florida, that served children from low-income families. One hundred and sixty-two centers were randomly assigned to one of three research-based curricula or to a control group that continued with its existing program. The curricula, while grounded in a common set of research findings, differed in intensity, pedagogic strategies, and use of technology. In each center, one classroom that served four-year-old children was selected for the study. Teachers and aides assigned to the three treatment groups received initial and follow-up training as well as ongoing mentoring over a period of approximately 18 months, from Fall 2003 to Spring 2005. The study tested two kinds of outcomes: teacher behavior and interactions with children, and aspects of the classroom environment that support children's language and literacy development, measured through direct observation; and children's language and pre-literacy skills, measured by their performance on a standardized assessment.
To determine whether the interventions that had produced significant outcomes at the end of preschool had any lasting positive effects on early school performance, mathematics and reading follow-up assessments were done in the spring of the 2007/2008 and 2008/2009 school years. Of the 1,535 children assessed in the original Florida Upgrade study, follow-up measurements were taken on 1,137 children (74 percent). Also obtained were follow-up measurements on 127 children who were in the study centers in the original randomized design, but who were not present at the time of the initial child assessments.
2011-06-10
16.
Recent College Graduates Survey, 1989-1990: CD-ROM Version [United States] (ICPSR 3004)
United States Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics
United States Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics
The Recent College Graduates (RCG) survey estimates the
potential supply of newly qualified teachers in the United States and
explores the immediate post-degree employment and education
experiences of individuals obtaining bachelor's or master's degrees
from American colleges and universities. The RCG survey, which focuses
heavily, but not exclusively, on those graduates qualified to teach at
the elementary and secondary levels, is designed to meet the following
objectives: (1) to determine how many graduates become eligible or
qualified to teach for the first time and how many are employed as
teachers in the year following graduation, by teaching field, (2) to
examine the relationship between courses taken, student achievement,
and occupational outcomes, and (3) to monitor unemployment rates and
average salaries of graduates by field of study. The RCG survey
collects information on education and employment of all graduates
(date of graduation, field of study, whether newly qualified to teach,
further enrollment, financial aid, employment status, and teacher
employment characteristics) as well as standard demographic
characteristics such as earnings, age, marital status, sex, and
race/ethnicity. The 1989-1990 survey (called RCG-91 because the data
were collected in 1991) contains four data files. Part 1 contains
variables from the main questionnaire and includes information on type
of degree received, teaching eligibility, certification, salary, and
whether the respondent was unemployed. Also included are transcripts
for sampled bachelor degree recipients. Part 2 contains verbatim
comments from graduates regarding fields of study, occupation, and
parents' occupations. Replicate weights are contained in Part 3, and
imputation flags are found in Part 4.
2006-01-18
17.
The Taiwan Education Panel Survey (TEPS) is a national longitudinal project initiated by Academia Sinica and jointly funded by Ministry of Education, the National Science Council, and Academia Sinica. The objective of TEPS is to stimulate more basic research in the fields of education, sociology, economics, and psychology by employing large scale panel data on representative samples of students, and their parents, teachers, and school administrators. In a nutshell, TEPS has five distinguishing features:
(1) Theory driven: The focus is on the skills, behavioral, values, and psychological consequences of schooling institutions and family environments of students. Factors that are found in the literature to affect students' learning outcomes are all included. Specifically speaking, an AOE model of learning outcomes, representing learning capabilities (Ability), learning opportunities (Opportunity), and the amount of effort made by the students (Effort), serves as a guiding framework for questionnaire development. Ability and effort are more on students themselves while opportunities covers family, teachers, and school environment, peers, and so forth.
(2) Student centered and multidimensional and multi-levels: Central to the project were questionnaire surveys of students. The data collection extends to cover the most influential actors in their learning environment: parents, teachers, and schools. It covered nested multiple levels of data - individual students, classes, and schools, etc.
(3) Panel surveys covering multiple programs and multiple cohorts: Students in junior high (G7 to G9), senior high (G10 to G12), vocational (G10 to G12), and junior college (G10 to G14) programs were administered for data collection. All students were followed at least twice. A portion of them were followed four times at G7, G9, G11, and G12. In light of the ongoing transformation of the Taiwanese educational system in 1990s, the project started with two cohorts of approximately 40,000 students, making it possible to employ a quasi-experimental design in future analysis.
(4) National representative samples of the students: Students under data collection were representative samples of the 1984/85 and 1988/89 birth cohorts. Weighting is provided according to the probabilistic sampling design.
(5) Public goods: Data are made available to the public as soon as the data collection and data cleaning is completed, thereby providing an important resource for both academic and policy research.
2015-02-12
18.
The Teacher Quality Grants Texas project is a broad, ongoing evaluative study with the goal of better understanding the professional growth in teachers who have self-selected to participate in focused, long-term professional development in mathematics or science provided by the Teacher Quality Granting Program (TQGP). The TQGP, funded through No Child Left Behind (NCLB), aims to improve the quality of teaching which, in turn, leads to improved student achievement.
The 2012-2014 cycle of this study includes administrative and qualitative data, much of which contain observation notes and comments from trained raters observing teachers in their classroom environments. The data include ratings on classroom activities, organization, student attention, type of student cognition, instructional inquiry demonstrated by teacher, and types of assessment. Teachers in the classroom were also rated on instructional, discourse, assessment, and curriculum factors. Additionally, the data contain pre- and post-scores of content tests taken by teachers at the high school level. Administrative data on teachers includes academic degree type, college hours in project topic area, whether teacher had an alternative emergency certificate, grade level(s) taught, teaching assignments related to grant topic area, certification exams passed before and after the grant project, teaching assignment after grant project, reason for leaving grant project, and number of project days and hours by year.
Additional qualitative data in this study includes participant reflective writings and interview transcripts. Teachers responded to a series of eight reflective prompts designed to elicit participant growth in subject matter, pedagogy, use of instructional technology, and development within a professional community of practice. A subset of teacher-participants were also interviewed by phone, during the summer following a year of grant participation.
2018-08-03
19.
The Teacher Quality Grants Texas project was a broad, evaluative study with the goal of better understanding the professional growth in teachers who self-selected to participate in focused, long-term professional development in mathematics or science provided by the Teacher Quality Granting Program (TQGP). The TQGP, funded through No Child Left Behind (NCLB), aimed to improve the quality of teaching which, in turn, leads to improved student achievement.
The 2014-2016 cycle of this study includes administrative and qualitative data, much of which contain observation notes and comments from trained raters observing teachers in their classroom environments. The data also include ratings on classroom activities, organization, student attention, type of student cognition, instructional inquiry demonstrated by teacher, and types of assessment. Teachers in the classroom were also rated on instructional, discourse, assessment, and curriculum factors. Additional, the data contain pre- and post-scores of content tests taken by teachers at the high school level. Administrative data on teachers includes academic degree type, college hours in project topic area, whether teacher had an alternative emergency certificate, grade level(s) taught, teaching assignments related to grant topic area, certification exams passed before and after the grant project, teaching assignment after grant project, reason for leaving grant project, and number of project days and hours by year.
Additional qualitative data in this study includes participant reflective writings and interview transcripts. Teachers responded to a series of eight reflective prompts designed to elicit participant growth in subject matter, pedagogy, use of instructional technology, and development within a professional community of practice. A subset of teacher-participants were also interviewed by phone, during the summer following a year of grant participation.
2018-10-01